[IndianaTrails] Breaking away down new trails
Robert J. Matter
rjmatter at prodigy.net
Mon May 22 06:40:09 PDT 2006
http://southbendtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060521/Opinion02/605210609/-1/OPINION/CAT=Opinion02
May 21. 2006 6:59AM
Breaking away down new trails
OUR OPINION
Communities need to make the most of their recreational assets. That's
why we've long supported development of nature, hiking and bike trails.
Not only do recreation trails provide the public with safe access to the
great outdoors, but they encourage physical activity. Health and fitness
data for Indiana indicate that physical activity is something Hoosiers
could use more of.
So good for Gov. Mitch Daniels, who says that his statewide travels have
shown him what seems to be a lack of vision in Indiana trail planning.
The governor's office is just the place to draw together and coordinate
a plan to link hiking and cycling trails all around the state.
We especially like the ideas expressed by Steve Slauson, deputy director
of the St. Joseph County Park Department. Slauson, in a May 7 report in
The Tribune by staff writer Martin DeAgostino, likened the trail
potential in Indiana to the interstate highway system. Arterial routes
would link cities, and smaller trails would connect with one another
inside communities.
That's thinking big. And thinking right. Without the linkage, trails
still are fun to follow. But they don't go anywhere. If the aim is to
attract tourism and the economic development that it brings, which is
what the governor seems to have in mind, then routes that appeal to
serious bikers and hikers are important.
Slauson will be a good voice on behalf of this region when he attends a
Department of Natural Resources trail summit on May 31. It is being
convened at the behest of the governor. The aim is a statewide plan of
action to address basic issues and be readied for public comment.
There are a lot of terrific trails throughout northern Indiana -- and
many more in southwestern Michigan. (While we're thinking big, why not
include Michigan?) Turning them into elements of a comprehensive plan
will only make them better.
We're with Daniels on this one. We don't want Indiana to be a dead-end
state, either.
###
More information about the List
mailing list